Irish Republican Conflict Junkies Unite!!

…..You Have Nothing To Lose But Your Chains…




The State of Norn Irony’s Deputy First Minister and former Chief Irish Republican negotiator during the Peace Process, Martin McGuinness has recent flagged the alarming increasing blight on Norn Irony society of ‘Conflict Junkies’.-so called dissident Irish Republicans…


If a 'Conflict Junky' support group existed, it could be called, F.A. (Fenian Anonymous, formerly Fenian Aspiration). If it did exist, then the following 12 Step Programme could be used to assist those who may feel dismayed or left behind by Sinn Fein’s direction on Irish Unity.

The 12 Steps to Stormont

[via Black Op GFA, (Give’m Fcuk All)]

STEP 1: We admitted we were powerless over Irish Partition and British Rule – that our 40 Year Struggle had become unmanageable due to infiltration by Supergrasses, [Steakknife & Stakeknife(**-See Footnotes), Brian Nelson,Kevin Fulton et al,] British State Collusion, Shoot to Kill, Sectarian Loyalist death squads, SAS Big Boy Rules, etc etc


STEP 2: Came to believe that a Power (John Hume/Tony Blair/Bertie Ahern) greater than ‘ourselves alone’ could restore us to sanity (Sunningdale Mark II).


STEP 3: Made a decision to turn our will and our political aspirations over to the care of God (aka Big Ian Paisley) as we understood Big Ian (Never, Never, Never).


STEP 4: Made a searching and fearless moral inventory of our Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD’s) and ‘The Disappeared”.


STEP 5: Admitted to Big Ian, to ‘ourselves alone’, and to John De Chastelain the exact nature of our WMD’s and where they were…


STEP 6: Were entirely ready to have Big Ian remove all these Fenian defects of character and succumbing to wearing sack clothes and ashes after rigorous mental rehabilitation to produce the Good Friday Agreement (later to be watered down to St Andrew’s/Hillsborough Agreements).


STEP 7: Humbly asked Big Ian should we remove our right to Self Determination through Articles 2 & 3..


STEP 8: Made a list of all persons harmed in the 40 Year Struggle via the Police Ombudsman Office & Historical Enquiries Team etc, and became willing to make amends to them ALL (via Eames/Bradley Report) by palming them of with £12K each!!.


STEP 9: Made direct amends to such people wherever possible, EXCEPT Dissident Irish Republicans where we ask their communities on the ‘Divided Island of Ireland’ to ‘TOUT’ on them to the Garda/PSNI.


STEP 10: Continued to take personal inventory of our Irish Republicanism and when we were wrong promptly admitted it. (EXEMPT: Being an ‘alleged’ member of the Irish Republican Army OR Calling our former Irish Republican comrades ‘Traitors, to the Partitioned Island of Ireland’).


STEP 11: Sought through the GFA/St. Andrew’s agreements, and tree hugging with Tony Blair to improve our conscious contact with Big Ian as we understood Big Ian, praying only for knowledge of Big Ian’s British Imperialist will for us and the power to carry that out after ringing Big Ian seven times for consent.


STEP 12: Having had a spiritual awakening (A Road to Stormont Conversion) as the result of these steps of capitulation, we will try to bluff this message (**, See Foot-notes) to other conflict junkies, and to practice these principles as we administer Britannia’s Rule at Stormont HQ (including her imminent Public sector CUTS) on Irish Soil.


Foot-notes:

*- Note, this is not a typo, there were 2 of them !! Click here  for further information.

** - Unlike Richardson’s fertiliser, this MESSAGE has to get a Standard & Poor’s like credibility rating, as it is still currently being tried and tested home and away (Afganistan, Iraq and Palestine).

Read More

Dealing with Norn Irony's Dissident Irish Republicans

Are Dissident Irish Republicans merely 'Conflict Junkies' ?

The State of Norn Irony’s Deputy First Minister, Martin McGuiness, recently launched a tirade against dissident Irish Republicans as he attended the recent Conservative Party Conference 2010 on the British mainland.

Whilst the Conservative conference had more Union Jacks flying than at the Queen’s coronation, Mr McGuiness remained undeterred and pulled no punches in condemnation of the,

‘when the cat’s away the mice will play bomb attack’

on the UK City of Culture 2011.
One of the less than flattering terms he used to describe the alleged dissident Irish Republican bombers was that of ‘conflict junkies’.

From an Island of Ireland perspective, McGuinness’s timing of the use of the phrase ‘conflict junkies’ could not been worse. At the very best such terminology could be described as extremely ill advised and at worst a cynical side swipe which could have resulted in a PR disaster for the Sinn Fein party within their grass root support. No doubt the current ranglings over NI budget has deflected sufficient attention for now.



An Ill Advised Knee Jerk Reaction?



Ill advised, as it came hot on the heals of Brian Cowan’s (& Ireland’s) very global public humiliation by American chat host Jay Lo of Biffo’s ill-fated morning radio interview. Apart from Cowan’s own personal disgrace, the whole affair re-awakened the world’s perception of the Irish ‘binge’ drinking culture persona. Couple this with McGuinness’s outburst; Irish America may not be exactly amused about the situation on the Island of Ireland!!! Furthermore, this latest dissident Irish Republican side swipe coincided with an extensive UTV news segment which was highlighting the ACTUAL and REAL problems of drug and alcohol addiction in the North. The feature UTV news report highlighted the growing concerns of those providing frontline services to those directly affected by drug/alcohol addiction. Their focus of immediate concern was the lack of adequate rehabilitation facilities which will be further exacerbated by the potential threat of imminent austerity measures and CUTS to N.I. front line medical services.



Politically, within the State of Northern Ireland, the irony that he should highlight this ever spreading blight upon post GFA Norn Iron will be neither lost on the Unionist/loyalist nor the dissident Irish Republican/PSF communities respectively.



Or a Cynical Side Swipe at Dissident Groups?

The ‘Junkies’ terminology is at worst cynical, for those hard-line, (and not necessarily dissident Irish Republicans) who will automatically point to McGuinness’s own contribution to the escalation of the 40 year Struggle and ask, what really has changed on the ground??. Back in the day, Martin McGuinness had a fiery and fanatical dedication to the militant cause of Irish Freedom. This is very evident from his speedy and meteoric rise through the ranks to become the (allegedly)  ‘PIRA Chief of Staff’. His unflinching single mindedness towards a military solution earned him the acrimonious title among the unionist community of ,‘IRA godfather of godfathers’!!!!

So much was he revered and admired amongst the ranks of the PIRA, he was plucked from relative media obscurity and selected as part of a PIRA delegation sent to England to meet William Whitelaw during the PIRA ceasefire of July, 1972.

So, to use substance addiction related terminology to judge McGuinness’s pro PIRA rhetoric and the militant gusto of his media interview performances during these times, you could be forgiven for making the assertion;

‘Be Jesus, Wasn’t Martin McGuinness A Serious Boy Back In the Day, he couldn’t be held back from gettin’ at the Brits, at all at all!!!’

The use of the word,' junkies’, denotes a complete lack of Irish Republican ideology behind the military tactics of the dissident groups. Martin McGuinness in a recent TV interview made a point of reinforcing his own Irish Republican credentials whilst emphatically dismissing the results of a poll which showed a 14% level of support for dissidents. But Martin McGuinness is all too aware that Irish Republican history has always swung between periods of conflict and dialogue although with decreasing levels of ferocity.



However, the pendulum still swung??  The highly respected Irish Republican, Gerard Hodgkins, also moved to play down the poll results by making the assumption that a lot of the 14% you wouldn’t want in a Republican movement. That maybe so, but this can be contradicted by the public acknowledgement by British security sources that these new dissident groups whilst being extremely small are extremely close knit. i.e. these new groups have adapted to alleviate the threat of super grass infiltration which blighted the PIRA campaign pre GFA. Such is the perceived threat that the PSNI Chief Constable, Matt Baggott, has been lobbying for access to “more than £200m of special funding from the treasury reserve during the next five years.”  As regards the David Cameron's defence cutting measures, extra monies will be made available to MI5/6 to keep a beady eye on the Fenian hordes in Norn Irony according to a recent report in the Financial Times:

‘International terrorism is another “tier 1” concern. The document points strikingly to the risk of a “significant increase in the levels of terrorism relating to Northern Ireland”. That indicates MI5 believes dissident republican groups are gaining strength – and might be able to mount a significant attack on the mainland. ‘

Could Martin McGuinness himself be pigeon holed as a reformed ‘Conflict Junky’?

 Those of the DUP/loyalist persuasion will point to Mr McGuinness’s own involvement during the 40 year struggle and automatically adopt a ‘kettle-pot’ analogy, since in their mind set ALL Irish Republican’s are tarred of the one brush. They may even see Mr McGuinness himself as a reformed ‘conflict junky’ as they once described him as the ‘IRA Godfather of Godfathers’. Given his transformation in strategies for Irish re-unification from armalite to unequivocal ballot box, they must quietly hope that he doesn’t suffer a relapse given the increasing pressure from dissident Irish Republican groups who are long past the micro group stage. They will also be scratching their heads in wondering why he cannot show more apathy towards dissuading and helping these ‘misguided’ Irish Republicans. In fact, there would be some who will be questioning why the DFM isn’t adopting a more hands on approach through dialogue with these Irish Republican militants.

Au contraire, anyone who had watched a recent DFM interview would have observed how he recognised the political dissident groups (32 CSM and others) whilst saying that the British/Irish governments were in communication with the militant groupings- perhaps a bit Pontius Pilate like? Surely such a self-centred attitude is not in keeping of a reformed 'conflict junky' and could well be construed in some quarters as egotistical??

No one can fault the PSF stalwarts that have stood behind the current leadership through thick and thin since the ousting of Ruairi O’Brodaigh as Sinn Fein President at the 1986 Ard Fheis. Back then Martin McGuinness’s youthful and exuberant speech on abstentionism (Resolution 162) began with the words:

‘I can give a commitment on behalf of the leadership that we have absolutely no intention of going to Westminster or Stormont.’

And concluded by rallying the party faithful with the assertion of:

‘Don’t go my friends. We will lead you to the republic.'

For many Irish Republicans, these words and promises must seem quite hollow now as they reflect on what actually has been achieved. Martin McGuinness and the leadership promised to take the ‘gun’ out of Irish politics. But the big question looming is:

By Sinn Fein’s very involvement in implementing Sunningdale Mark II via the Stormont Executive, are they themselves now complicit in bringing the ‘gun’ back into Irish politics?

Read More

Will we ever be: 'A Nation Once Again ?'

[- "A nation?" says Bloom. "A Nation is the same people living in the same place."
- "By God, then," says Ned, laughing, "if that’s so I’m a Nation for I’m living in the same place for the past five years."
So of course everyone had the laugh at Bloom and says he, trying to muck out of it:
"Or also living in different places."]

~James Joyce, Ulysses~

Northern Ireland's Deputy First Minister, Martin McGuinness, again cranked up the pressure on Dissident Republican Groups in Derry and Northern Ireland. In a stinging attack and rebuke of their activities, he accused them of effectively ’Ghettoising’ areas of Derry City.

"They have effectively tried to turn parts of Derry into a slum."
~Martin McGuinness~

Republicanism’s chief negotiator during the peace process was recently informed by the Police Service of Northern Ireland (PSNI) of alleged potential threats on his life by Real IRA. However, given the level of criticism being brandished at the Deputy First Minister (N.I.) from within grass roots Republicanism, he is facing up quite bullishly to these criticisms, as expressed in a recent interview with the ‘Derry Journal'. He also remains adamant that Sinn Fein’s road map towards a United Ireland is still on track! He dismissed the recent upsurge in Dissident activity as,

“self-serving”

and described them as

“imposters”

,
who’s main goal was to hijack the ideals of Republicanism. He dismissed their claims of being the true exponents of Irish Republican Ideology as mere:

“flags of convenience for criminality and drug dealing.”

Mr McGuinness is due to attend a public meeting in Derry this Thursday, as principle speaker, and it is hoped that recent rumblings of discontent will not over shadow the planned topics up for discussion!

"Life springs from death; and from the graves of patriot men and women spring living nations. The Defenders of this Realm have worked well in secret and in the open. They think that they have pacified Ireland. They think that they have purchased half of us and intimidated the other half. They think that they have foreseen everything, think that they have provided against everything; but the fools, the fools, the fools! — they have left us our Fenian dead, and while Ireland holds these graves, Ireland unfree shall never be at peace!"

~ Padraig Pearse~

Read More

Our Brave New World.......

Has Sinn Fein now become a victim of their own countless spin? On hindsight we need look no further than the Blair years and the Good Friday agreement and how they brought us to that point in the first place, lest we forget! To reach that momentous point in our embattled history the SF leadership on numerous occasions re-iterated upon the republican movement 'of not a bullet not an ounce' attitude would be the driving force on negotiating any agreement with the British government.

However, since then the republican movement (the very foundation upon which SF are built) has had to endure anything but! They have been forced to sit back and witness the steady dilution and possible erosion of their core fundamental ideas for which many of them devoted their lives and energies to strive for. The major repercussion is that serious issues and commitments being swept under the carpet by media manipulation and good old fashioned hood winking. Does this strategy of

‘eyes wide shut!’

seem familiar? And hence, this apparent refusal to accept and deal with disgruntlement among the grass roots has all culminated in the inner vacuum, which has unfortunately manifested itself in the happenings over the last few days.

How can Martin McGuinness expect genuine republicans (not the band wagon ones who SF seem so keen to need to keep their votal dominance), to believe a man who in the one hand exacerbates about the hurt the soldiers caused on our streets yet on the other hand can find nothing to say about the fact that his Stormont government is HARBOURING & TRAINING foreign forces here, until they await deployment in Iraq & Afghanistan. This defies all logic and flies in the face of true republican beliefs. In an essence, we are aiding and abetting in the British imperialist attempts to occupy foreign lands. I personally find it despicable that all of our illustrious leaders and self-professed freedom fighters can only sit back and watch unabated at the suffering caused by conflicts in the Middle East! Have they now taken a vow of silence to appease their new bedfellows in Stormont?

Complacency and arrogance that accompanies the notion that

'the job is done boys!'

has befallen the movement as it turns its attention to trying to become a voice in the Republic. But wait a moment; surely their whole '

raison d'etre'

was to deliver 32 counties and emancipate their people! There current strategy, or lack of, seems to be shrouded in mystery to the point that is frankly farcical!

So alas, we find ourselves in our current predicament. Many may feel that my comments are lambasting the leadership of SF as having failed, but this not entirely so. Yes, in some respects without them we probably would not have got to where we are today. But there in lies the conundrum! Where exactly are we today? Are we any closer to a United Ireland, the Holy Grail for republicans? To get to the Good Friday agreement we were bombarded by ‘Road Maps’ and time deadlines. However, since then there has not been a single mention of complete and unequivocal removal of British forces from Ireland. Yet the British government has made their precise withdrawal from Iraq and Afghanistan a key focal point of their PR machine to their own people.

Over the last few days we have been witnessing a doomsday scenario from all forms of the media. All this is doing is fuelling the flames of resentment and hostility already being felt on the ground. Also, to right of the perpetrators as criminals and cowards is extremely counter productive. This aloof attitude is only acting as a recruitment mechanism and serves only to appease the masses in the short term. Like it or not their core fundamental belief system exists and is there main driving force. Fortunately for now, we are no where near the point of no return but it would be futile, arrogant and extremely fool hardy for anyone to under estimate these mini-eruptions of dis-contentment, especially for the ranks of SF. To prevent a further escalation of unrest and dis-quiet it is time for our leaders to show true leadership as indicative of their forefathers and predecessors. It is time to admit truthfully to their electorate that their original aims and objectives will not be fully achieved, and give a full and frank state of the nation like appraisal to their electorate of where the hopes and dreams of Irish Republicans actually lies.

Read More

Political Solution or Political Illusion Part I

I have always been intrigued through out history about the mystery of illusionists and now they captivated and enthused their audiences. Not to bore you with the details, the art of illusion falls into three broad categories, optical, auditory and tactile, with the former two the best known by most of us.



However, prestidigitation or misdirection is the fundamental backbone of many illusions. The true art of illusion involves focusing the audience’s attention on one object or place while the actual trick is conducted elsewhere.
The art of illusion has always been synonymous with politics through out world history and unfortunately our own shores have not escaped it’s effects.
However, when an entire society subscribes to an illusion, mankind will inevitably correct the transgression, or perish as a whole. Have no doubt; confronting strong proponents of illusions requires eternal vigilance. Vigilance in this context can only mean; confronting a persistent political illusion with a legitimate political vision.

‘Facts are stubborn things; and whatever maybe our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passions, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence!’ (John Adams, 2nd American President, 1797–1801)

,

So how can the art of illusion be adapted to our current political situation. In one word ‘The Good Friday Agreement’!! In my opinion this agreement provided the imaginary cloak for Britain’s plan to burden us with the next phase of it’s very calculated and visionary imperial agenda!

In my previous letter I made reference to British Imperialism and it’s effect upon the Irish people. But on closer inspection Imperialism can take many guises and not just the military form which we all pre-occupied ourselves with and were subject to up until The Good Friday Agreement. (and to some Republican’s still are!!!)

As the British government will know, through their practices both here and on foreign soils, military imperialism is only the first step in establishing imperial hegemony - (a word I will explain later)- and a very uneconomic one at that! It is costly and, by itself, produces few long-term benefits for the colonizer. Therefore, it must be followed by strategies to persuade the colonized to accept their condition and transfer their allegiance to their conquerors to ensure an uninterrupted flow of benefits from colonized to colonizer without further military intervention. Hence military imperialism transforms itself into linguistic and cultural imperialism.

Hegemony can be best described as the processes by which a dominant culture maintains its dominant position: for example, the use of institutions to formalize power; the employment of a bureaucracy to make power seem abstract (and, therefore, not attached to any one individual); the setting up a police force to control opposition. To the sceptics this will resemble very much our Stormont government of today and on the ongoing debate regarding The Irish Language Bill, The Policing & Justice Bill and cultural and emblems issues. The recent rumblings of disquiet from dissident Republican groups are just the repercussions of when, once insurgent ideology, threatens to become hemogenic.

However, let us not kid ourselves that we are any better off from having no more military imperialism. By their very nature, linguistic and cultural imperialism are more insidious than the military form!! There is a very fine line demarcating political vision and political illusion especially since memory and recollection play such a major part in our nationalist and republican tradition.

So to all you traditional Republican’s out there, I will sign of with an extract from one of two ballads inserted in the play ‘The Freedom of the City’ by Brian Friel: and depicts the aftermath of three IRA volunteers who were shot in the Guild Hall Square, Derry.

“We’ll not forget that sunny evening, nor the names of these bold three
Who gave their lives for their ideal – Mother Ireland, one and free.
They join the lines of long-gone heroes, England’s victims, one and all.
We have their memory still to guide us; we have their courage to recall”

Read More

Trust Your Leaders! (UNCENSORED)

In 1915, James Connolly proclaimed the immortal words

“Trust Your Leaders!”

Nearly a century later, traditional Irish Republicans are re-iterating and pondering over the very same words, but with a fundamentally different tone!

In many republicans’ minds, the exclamation mark has now been replaced by a question mark. Irish history has shown that our embattled people have always placed our leaders on pedestals during extenuating circumstances, investing their time and energies believing and implementing their ideologies. During conflict we have idealised them to the point that any form of criticisms or protest was perceived as derisory and near sacrilege to the cause. However, when upon realising that these heroes were but mere mortals, we were guilty of quickly turning the same level of adoration, in equal measure, into ferocious condemnation and contempt, leading all too often to tragic consequences.
However, undeterred, our illustrious leaders have always by tradition, professed to inspire faith and purpose in our people through out our history of decimation and adversity at the hands of British Imperialism. From Charles Stewart Parnell to Michael Collins, their British counterparts of their time could not undermine their forth-rightness and remarkable steadfastness to their cause. Their principle over riding goal was always not to remake society but to remake government. Of Parnell, William Ewart Gladstone, described him as the most remarkable person he had ever met, whilst a future Liberal Prime Minister, Herbert Henry Asquith, described him as one of the three or four greatest men of the nineteenth century! Of Collin’s, Winston Churchill, who was actively involved in the British negotiating team of the 1920 Anglo-Irish Treaty spoke of his adversary,

“He supplied those qualities of action and personality without which the foundation of Irish nationhood would not have been established."

However, will such comments ever be bestowed upon our current SF leaders in this, the 21st century?
Any history book on successful conflict resolution will unequivocally tell you that a revolutionist who surrenders the initiative to the enemy is already defeated before any negotiation takes place! To many traditional republicans involved in the current struggle, this surrender of the initiative was remonstrated in both Decommissioning and the provision of Articles 2 & 3, to be used as bargaining chips. In return, The Good Friday agreement and all its complexities, was designed to herald a time for momentus change, i.e. a complete break from the past and those dark days. However, to accommodate this grand meeting of minds Adams & McGuinness had to follow a similar path to that of their predecessor Michael Collins. And like Collins, the current Sinn Fein leadership has accepted institutions and ideas which leave a bitter taste in the mouths of traditional republicans. Through self-professed extenuating circumstances, Sinn Fein has in effect accepted a two-state solution, agreed to take part in partitionist Stormont and in essence succumb to adhere to British rule. Yet, in many of their addresses to rally support from their party faithful pre-Good Friday, they strenuously vowed such conditions would be unequivocally unacceptable as an outcome to any negotiations.
However, unfortunately, that is where the similarities between Collin’s negotiations and those of the current SF leadership abruptly end! Back then Collins assumed leadership of a fledgling state (FREE of all British forces) and took command of a national army into which many of his IRA comrades could be absorbed into. In effect, he was given the platform on which to build a new Irish state based on the principles of

‘liberty, equality, and fraternity’

, and in his own words the republican movement of that era had fought and died and WON

“the freedom to achieve freedom”

. Au contraire, given such a platform and mandate, the current SF leadership cannot boast of such lofty successes. Instead, all we seem to have achieved are a few seats in Sunningdale Mark II, no commitment from the British government to remove their troops let alone a withdrawal date. Furthermore, we as a society are faced with the yet unknown future consequences of rumblings of discontent and dis-satisfaction within the republican movement itself.
If only our current leaders could use such inspirational language as Connolly, Collins, Pearse et al. Much has been made recently about Martin McGuinness's comments regarding the description of dissident republicans as

“traitors to the island of Ireland”

. Leaving aside the whole hypocracy debate that ensued, it is very important to fully understand the meaning of the diction that our leaders use especially if it is to be deemed in some quarters as inflammatory and provocative. Therefore, we must ask ourselves what exactly is the true definition of a traitor? According to the online dictionary provided by Farlex (www.thefreedictionary.com) a traitor is described as ‘One who betrays one's country, a cause, or a trust, especially one who commits treason’. As Deputy First Minister, it is perfectly legitimate for him to point out the futility of an armed struggle and to do so will not advance the cause of a United Ireland. However, for all our sakes, he thankfully stopped short of accusing them of the latter word treason, which in itself is defined as a ‘Violation of allegiance toward one's country or sovereign, especially the betrayal of one's country by waging war against it or by consciously and purposely acting to aid its enemies.’
For many republicans the current political situation continues to throw up a volley of unanswered questions rather than answers. For example:

Will the unravelling of future events unveil that the current SF leaders valued their own personal political power or other interests over the cause?

Did they too, unwittingly become ravaged, as the IRA did in the mid 90’s, by infiltration by British Intelligence agents, which would have undoubtedly, seriously compromised their future bargaining position?

Or, ultimately, will this generation of Irish Republican voters have been deemed to have overestimated the ambition and underestimated the current SF leadership’s conviction to the cause?

Read More